Posted on 03 April 2011 at 17:12h
Last week my first year classes were doing a design experiment with a rubber bung on an elastic band. It's quite a good example and students don't find it too difficult to come up with interesting and do-able research questions. A lot of the experiments revolve around oscillations, often related to the length of time for the oscillations to die out rather than the frequency of the oscillation.
Why is that?
We hardly mention damping but everyone wants to do research questions related to it. Maybe it's a misunderstanding of what time period is?
One of the students was measuring the time period for the oscillation of the bung on one elastic. This oscillated pretty fast so went over to see how he was timing it. Actually, to be honest went over to point out that it wasn't possible to count so fast. To my surprise he was able to count so fast by counting every 4 oscillations. The student in question (It's Oliver) is a pretty good musician and was able to recognise when there had been 4 oscillations without actually counting them. Quite a neat trick. I bet Richard Feynman could do that too.
Tag Cloud
Recent Posts
The sound of one hand rotating
Flat tyres will get you nowhere
Malus through the looking glass
Sherlock Holmes in black and white
Another good example thwarted by the truth
Challenging the laws of nature
Being negative for the sake of it
Chemistry wins the flint argument
Lies are more impressive than the truth
SMARTboard with visually impaired students
wireless electricity at Riga airport
On the fringe of Eurovision 2011
Dogs don't like digital marking
Inconveniently complicated truth
Red sky at night shepherds delight
Spring is coming (in about 4 months)
Comments
Post a comment about the contents of this page. To post comments you need to log in. If it is your first time you will need to subscribe.
No one has yet posted any comment. Be the first to comment.